Am 21. September 2019 19:09:55 MESZ schrieb David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: > >> Here's an updated version of the Stockhausen example, with a lot of >> added comments to the source code. >> >> I've also attached an image of rendering the old code (as present in >> the git) with a lilypond binary from current git. > >[...] > >Looking at the image, this appears more to the credit of LilyPond than >Stockhausen. I have a hard time imagining a performer bringing this to >life in a manner justifying the complexity written into the score.
Why? It seems you haven"t heard enough of today"s highly qualified and dedicated performers ... Urs > >-- >David Kastrup > >_______________________________________________ >lilypond-devel mailing list >lilypond-devel@gnu.org >https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Gerät mit K-9 Mail gesendet. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
