Lukas-Fabian Moser <l...@gmx.de> writes:

> To me, this would seem to suggest that the "less invasive" bugfix I
> proposed (by rounding) would in fact preserve the incompleteness in
> the move from int to float calculations that Han-Wen probably
> introduced by accident (unless (*) is motivated in a way I do not
> understand). This would seem to me to suggest that (*) should be
> replaced by a straight "lastpos = p;".

Agreed.

> It all comes down to the question I can't answer due to lack of
> knowledge about the internal workings: What's the rationale for the
> claim that dy can only be integer or .5?

I think short of rewriting everything to use integers again, removing
the int cast seems like the fix more in line with what the code is
currently written to do/be.

-- 
David Kastrup

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to