Lukas-Fabian Moser <l...@gmx.de> writes: > To me, this would seem to suggest that the "less invasive" bugfix I > proposed (by rounding) would in fact preserve the incompleteness in > the move from int to float calculations that Han-Wen probably > introduced by accident (unless (*) is motivated in a way I do not > understand). This would seem to me to suggest that (*) should be > replaced by a straight "lastpos = p;".
Agreed. > It all comes down to the question I can't answer due to lack of > knowledge about the internal workings: What's the rationale for the > claim that dy can only be integer or .5? I think short of rewriting everything to use integers again, removing the int cast seems like the fix more in line with what the code is currently written to do/be. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
