> On 14 Mar 2019, at 18:25, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > The passage in question reads > > 6. Conveying Non-Source Forms. > > You may convey a covered work in object code form under the terms > of sections 4 and 5, provided that you also convey the > machine-readable Corresponding Source under the terms of this License, > in one of these ways:
So possibly you have an objection distributing the PDF without its source code under those forms together with the source code of the program!? >>>> MacPorts admits distinguishing between dependencies for build and >>>> the binary installer, so the latter can have just the docs without >>>> the stuff required to build it. >>> >>> Unless I am mistaken we are talking about the documentation being >>> completely absent. Which is legitimate but unfortunate. >> >> There are various possibilities. > > Usually an applicable truism even if I have no clue what you are > referring to here. MacPorts admits making an independent binary installer from the distribution and one can choose what dependencies should be included, and also its install location. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
