> On 14 Mar 2019, at 17:00, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> writes: > >>> Well, it certainly is not desirable when the documentation is missing >>> but the GPL demands providing the source code and associated scripts for >>> everything you distribute. >> >> I think it suffices to have it provided, not necessarily in a specific >> main distribution. These days, Internet should suffice. > > It doesn't matter what you think when the conditions are spelled out > clearly in the GPL.
It doesn't matter what you think it says if you don't interpret it properly. >> MacPorts admits distinguishing between dependencies for build and the >> binary installer, so the latter can have just the docs without the >> stuff required to build it. > > Unless I am mistaken we are talking about the documentation being > completely absent. Which is legitimate but unfortunate. There are various possibilities. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
