On 2019/02/28 09:21:34, Malte Meyn wrote:
On 2019/02/28 09:15:44, lemzwerg wrote:
> LGTM. However, I'm not completely happy with it. What about making
\fermata
> (and \fermataMarkup) accept an optional argument that indicates the
type:
>
> \fermata 'short
> \fermata 'veryLong
I’m not sure whether that would be an improvement; I used the same
names as for
the scripts as it is done with \fermata[Markup]:
% currently possible
\markup \fermata
{ b1-\fermata R\fermataMarkup }
% after this patch
\markup \verylongfermata
{ b1-\verlylongfermata R\verylongfermataMarkup }
\fermata 'verylong isn’t easier to type or to remember than
\verylongfermata
IMHO.
> \fermata "arbitrary markup stuff"
We definitely don’t need that. If you want a script, just use the
correct
command like -. or \staccato or a TextScript. If you want a markup,
just write
\markup "foo" instead of \markup \fermata "foo". If you want to center
something
above a MultiMeasureRest, just use { R1-"foo" } instead of {
R1-\fermataMarkup
"foo" }.
https://codereview.appspot.com/344160043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
