On 2019/02/08 16:41:06, dak wrote:
For what?
For making some functions ever so slightly less cumbersome to type and to read. But I’m gathering from your question that you’ve never felt any need for it :-) Since you’re complaining about LilyPond-specific functions not handled by Guile, what about assoc-get? From what I gather, this remains entirely bound to our codebase? BTW, just out of curiosity: when you say "let’s not make things opaque to the Scheme compiler", are you referring to something already existing with Guile 1.8 and which I’ve (very conceivably) never heard about, or only to the JIT-bytecode feature that’s been introduced with v2.0? V. https://codereview.appspot.com/345190043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
