On 2019/02/08 12:45:43, Valentin Villenave wrote:
On 2019/02/08 11:51:37, dak wrote: > Frankly, I don't like it. The relevant metric here is the user time
and it's
> _increased_ in your benchmark (not that it's likely significant).
Agreed.
> Throwing code in that the compiler does not know about is > not likely to be much of an advantage.
In that case, how about adding these as mere Scheme shortcuts? not-null?, in particular, would be quite useful.
For what? https://codereview.appspot.com/345190043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
