Am Di., 22. Jan. 2019 um 08:24 Uhr schrieb Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org>: > > >> Can you repeat the whole thing without any options for parallel > >> computing and show us the output of > >> > >> make check &> make.check.log & > >> > >> please? I could then compare it directly with my log file. > > > > I downgraded ghostscript to 9.26, still failing. So likely not a > > gs-problem. > > > > Attached the make.check.log > > Thanks. Replacing your path to lilypond with mine, then doing > `colorwdiff', I immediately see a different value for > LILYPOND_BOOK_LILYPOND_FLAGS. Looking it up with > > git grep LILYPOND_BOOK_LILYPOND_FLAGS > > brings me to file `make/lysdoc-targets.make'. Obviously, you don't > use `extractpdfmark', right? However, this shouldn't be a problem, at > least theoretically.
Yep, 'extractpdfmark' is optional, so I didn't bother for now. > > The last command present in both my and your log file is > > gs -sDEVICE=png16m \ > -dGraphicsAlphaBits=4 \ > -dTextAlphaBits=4 \ > > -slilypond-datadir=input/regression/out-test-baseline/share/lilypond/current \ > -r101 \ > -dAutoRotatePages=/None \ > -dPrinted=false \ > -sOutputFile=/home/hermann/test-output-distance.png \ > -dNOSAFER \ > -dEPSCrop \ > -q \ > -dNOPAUSE \ > test-output-distance.eps \ > -c quit > > to be executed while in directory > > /home/hermann/lilypond-git/build/input/regression/out-test-baseline > > (I'll soon add a patch to make `output-distance.py' show the > directory) – can you execute this command manually? In the above, > I've already adjusted `-sOutputFile'... For me this works just > fine. I'm very busy today, not sure I'm able to give it a try before tomorrow evening. Many thanks, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
