On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 5:46 PM Hans Åberg <haber...@telia.com> wrote:
> Is this right? It is traditional to raise the third below the finalis, but > not in the octave above, and it looks as though is a. I found this [1], it > has an additional accidental at e. > > Then the finalis should also be the key, as it is always within the scale. > Typically but bestenigar is one of those rare makams in which it's not and keep in mind this only happened 2 out of 91 makams for me so far. There's bound to be at least one more. In terms of musicality I get it...bestenigar's behavior starts out and uses so much of makam saba's behavior. It's a quick turn at the end to a finalis on the pitch IRAK. And the high leading tone of eb will never find its way into the key signature. http://www.neyzen.com/nota_arsivi/02_klasik_eserler/011_bestenigar/bestenigar_p_tanburi_numan_ney.pdf > Is is then possible to have both f and fb, and set the key signature as to > want. > I would just recommend going with what's tradition. I actually find it difficult to read through bestenigar pieces with the fb in the key signature and not showing up in the score. It doesn't look familiar to me. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
