Thanks James for this information, I’m a newbie regarding the way the 
lilypond-devel people operate.

JM

> Le 3 sept. 2018 à 12:49, James Lowe <pkx1...@runbox.com> a écrit :
> 
> Hello Jaques
> 
> 
> On 02/09/18 20:33, Menu Jacques wrote:
>> Hello James,
>> 
>> 
>>> Please also don't forget that it (whatever 'it' is, and assuming it is 
>>> accepted) will need to work when run against our regression tests (i.e. 
>>> make test-baseline/check).
>>> 
>>> http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor-big-page#musicxml-tests
>>>  
>>> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor-big-page#musicxml-tests>
>> These tests are what I named the Unofficial Test Suite in my OP, as they 
>> were called when I started my project. Most of them are already translated 
>> satisfactorily by xml2ly.
>> 
>> JM
> Sorry, I am not a developer just the Patch Meister who currently also tests 
> and checks all patches via our 'make' scripts.
> 
> So if your code was added 'now' and I were to run autoconf and then make 
> test-baseline/make check commands the xml2ly function would be exercised 
> properly (and then again for any new patches that were added) If not then the 
> additional code changes I was referring to would be specifically to do with 
> the regression test part of all our make scripts.
> 
> James

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to