2018-08-04 17:05 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: > Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@gmail.com> writes: > >> 2018-08-02 23:02 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org>: >> >>> It is still being used, however, even though it has become impossible to >>> set it. More exactly, its hard-coded fallback value is being used. >>> >>> Should we stick with that and just drop the name of the property >>> altogether? It does not seem like it has been missed all that much... >> >> >> Regarding the recent discussion I'd vote to keep it as is for the time being. >> >> >> With the following minimal reimplementation it's settable again, so >> everyone interested may do experiments. >> >> #(set-object-property! 'skyline-quantizing 'backend-type? number?) > > Sigh. It's still not part of any interface or of any grob description > and meddling with undocumented internals is not guaranteed to get the > results you desire.
Indeed. Thus I called it a _minimal_ reimplementation ;) > It's not like I am intentionally looking for ways to annoy people: this > egg blew up in my face while working on significant performance > enhancements. I don't feel annoyed. I just wanted to point to a method how one can do experiments with 'skyline-quantizing. Doing some empiricals with (more or less) working code may return more info/experiences about how we should proceed with it, imho. Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
