>> David Kastrup wrote >There is not a single message to be found from you regarding that in any of the archives...
>It's definitely not material fit for reentering for 2.20... I don't recall seeing a posting saying the feature was to be removed, so I did not preemptively protest the removal. I might easily have missed the existence of that discussion. In the grand scheme of this project, considering the huge number of changes at the time and the overall excellent improvement of skylines that was retained, it was not a huge deal. It is you who brought up the question, and my impression was that you wanted feedback. Sorry you're unhappy that I would like to have it back. It is clear that 2.20 is in the process of being hardened and that your work on the code at this point is for the future. I am not insisting on having this option; I do think it valuable. The strength of LilyPond is in the versatility. Giving the user control rather than hardcoding values seems to me the preferable course. davidC -- Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Dev-f88644.html _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
