On 2017/09/27 11:49:51, knupero wrote:
> How about just --pdf=<purpose> ?  One option less to remember.  This
is going
to
> be double the fun once we can generate PDF bypassing PS altogether.

Yes, even better.

> Sounds like a good strategy.  Just not in time for 2.20.

I tend to agree.

Well, so much for my plan of making the same options work for 2.20 and
2.21.  Perhaps one can amend the set of -dxxx specialist options and
keep them around, and then in 2.21 implement the more high-level
purpose-based system that sets a bunch of subordinate options then.

Then at least the specialist calls will keep doing the same (even though
the _motivation_ for using them might change, so it might lead to people
keeping behavior that they don't need any more).

https://codereview.appspot.com/325630043/

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to