On 2017/09/27 04:55:31, wl_gnu.org wrote:
> Somehow, concisely say "get-rid-of-anything-extra" versus
> "keep-everything-that-comes?"
>
> --min-fonts and --max-fonts
> --compress-fonts and --expand-fonts
I would rather prefer --compress-fonts and --no-compress-fonts. This
is easier to remember (and rather common in GNU packages).
> --drop-fonts and --keep-fonts
> --trim-fonts and --leave-fonts
> --compact-fonts and --full-fonts
> --few-fonts and --all-fonts
--optimize-fonts and --no-optimize-fonts
Werner
Werner beat me to it.
--optimize-fonts for me too please.
Although from a casual user's point of view why would I NOT want to
'optimize' [anything]?
I.e why wouldn't this be the [silent] default (i.e. no switch required)
and we just have the '--no-optimize-fonts' option available. I am
assuming it might be a time-taken-to-process-the-PDF thing (I do
apologise for not really being able to follow the thread here). Anyway,
I don't need any justification or explanation. I just came by to '+1'
Werner's suggestion really.
James
https://codereview.appspot.com/325630043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
