James <p...@gnu.org> writes: > David, > > On Thu, 17 Aug 2017 09:21:03 +0200 > David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > > >> >> Can't think of anything right now. >> > > How about the 'Fixed_x_x_x' label we use in the tracker when a patch is > pushed. So for example if we continue to put the unstable version there > is that 'good enough'?
If the next unstable release is slated to be 2.21.0, maybe we should adjust this accordingly. It would then be my job on cherry-picking to add a Fixed_2_20_0 label. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
