On 2017/02/17 07:24:42, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/318580043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely
File Documentation/notation/staff.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/318580043/diff/1/Documentation/notation/staff.itely#newcode793
Documentation/notation/staff.itely:793: removed from the
@code{PianoStaff}
context to allow individual staves to
Sorry, but that makes no sense. Use GrandStaff instead of PianoStaff
if you
don't want a PianoStaff.
Documentation should not focus about how to use the wrong tool for the
job. If
you want to document it, do it the other way round: explain how you
can keep the
staves of a GrandStaff together and then mention that this behavior is
desired
so often for piano that PianoStaff is already separately available.
I don't see how PianoStaff is the wrong tool to notate piano music.
But I will see to rewriting it the other way round.
https://codereview.appspot.com/318580043/
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
