Hi Federico, 2016-12-14 13:53 GMT+01:00 Federico Bruni <f...@inventati.org>: > Hi all > > Eventually I managed to build the new ISO. > I decided to upgrade to Stretch (still in testing), because otherwise I had > problems with pinning guile-2.0 from testing. Another advantage is that in > Stretch there's also LxQT (successor of LXDE), which seems lightweight, fast > and feature-rich. > > You can donwload the image here: > https://github.com/fedelibre/LilyDev/releases/tag/v5.0 > > Let me know if you find any problem. > > > Notable changes: > > - upgrade to Debian 9 Stretch and live-build 5 > - switch to [LXQt](http://lxqt.org/), successor of LXDE > - upgrade to guile-2 > - update some lilypond build dependencies > - added samba support: now you can share files between host and guest just > by using in the file manager a link like `smb://10.0.20.10/` (replace it > with your local IP); bookmark the link and it will be always available under > Places. > > Let me know if you need any guidance with Samba shares, in case you prefer > using libvirt instead of VirtualBox.
I just tried it, but had to download a newer VirtualBox than my 64-bit Ubuntu-16.04 offered, i.e I switched from 5.0.24 to 5.1.11. It firstly didn't work out, although I followed Jame's advice right from the start. No idea how I got it finally working ... Though, I was surprised not to find the lilypond-git-repo. Did I overlook somthing? Anyway I cloned it manually. Compiling LilyPond with ../configure --enable-guile2 returns: [...] WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs or files: URW++ OTF fonts (download OTF files from 'http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=urw-core35-fonts.git;a=commit;h=79bcdfb34fbce12b592cce389fa7a19da6b5b018' and put them under '~/.local/share/fonts' etc., or use --with-urwotf-dir) extractpdfmark (Optionally using Ghostscript >= 9.20 together with Extract PDFmark can significantly reduce the disk space required for building the documentation and the final PDF files.) [...] May I suggest to include those fonts in next release? Otherwise it works fine so far, maybe a bit slower than usual. (Not LilyPond, but the whole thingy.) Or maybe more memory-consuming (I remember this from earlier versions of VB). Cheers, Harm _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
