On 2016-12-22 14:53, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Alexander et al.!
how about putting the patch on Rietveld?
I agree that this should go into a normal patch review process
now. Knut, are you familiar with the git cl proceedings? If not,
it’s explained in the CG 1.3 and 2.3.
+1. Let us know if you need help. I went through the procedure just
a few days ago, so my knowledge is scarce, but fresh.
As I will not do it anybody is invited to put that patch on
Rietveld. You might call me pigheaded, but I don't accept to be
forced to use a google account. Of course I will react to any
reasonable change request.
I get your point. I dislike it as well, but gave in to the pressure (not
here, but elsewhere) long ago. I try to keep contact data and calendar
away from the big G as much as possible, and only use the mail address
to forward to another, but still. Go{d,ogle} alone knows what they
harvest...
Anyway, I can take care of uploading the patch. Will do so in the
evening, most probably.
Cheers,
Alexander
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
