Hi Alexander et al.!
how about putting the patch on Rietveld?

I agree that this should go into a normal patch review process now.
Knut, are you familiar with the git cl proceedings? If not, it’s
explained in the CG 1.3 and 2.3.

+1. Let us know if you need help. I went through the procedure just a few days ago, so my knowledge is scarce, but fresh.

As I will not do it anybody is invited to put that patch on Rietveld. You might 
call me pigheaded,
but I don't accept to be forced to use a google account. Of course I will react 
to any reasonable
change request.

Cheers,
 Knut

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to