Noeck wrote Friday, December 16, 2016 9:08 PM > Am 16.12.2016 um 17:38 schrieb Alexander Kobel: >> [2] Side Note: other proposed names for minimum-length so far: >> >> (1) minimum-space >> (2) show-length >> (3) hide-below-length >> (4) hide-if-shorter-than >> (5) minimum-visibility >> (6) visibility-threshold >> (7) printing-threshold >> (8) extender-threshold > > At a first glance, the property is still the same, just the behaviour > for shorter extenders changed: > > before: shorter extenders are prolonged > after: shorter extenders are not visible > > But at a second glance, the minimum-length for LilyPond grobs usually > means that the object is visible and the length is at least > minimum-length (for glissandi, etc.). Using it to hide a shorter object > feels inconsistent, IMHO. So I agree with Werner. But I have no > favourite naming, all of them sound wrong to me - a slight preference > for (6).
Definitely not "minimum-length" which means "Try to make a spanner at least this long." How about "collapse-length", which would be analogous to "collapse-height"? This exists already and means "Minimum height of system start delimiter. If equal or smaller, the bracket/brace/line is removed." "remove-threshold" is another possibility. Trevor _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
