On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 06:03:28PM +0000, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > On 12/5/16 10:28 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Graham Percival" > <lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu....@gnu.org on behalf of > gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote: > > >The website *is* tied to the documentation. That decision was > >made in 2009, and the reasons are just as valid today. > > I believe you when you say this. But I am having a hard time finding a > record of the decision. I expected to find it in the CG under > Administrative Policies or under Website work. I couldn't find it either > place. Can you help me find a pointer to the discussion and/or the > decision rationale?
Good question, and I still don't have a good answer. This was before we started keeping records of any decisions. The earliest I found was this: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2008-12/msg00574.html which didn't spark a whole lot of discussion. The current website didn't start to become visible until late 2009. I had a vague memory of a much more in-depth discussion, but perhaps that was sometime in 2010 or 2011. I'll continue to trawl through the archives to see if there's more info. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
