On 12/5/16 10:28 AM, "lilypond-devel on behalf of Graham Percival" <lilypond-devel-bounces+c_sorensen=byu....@gnu.org on behalf of gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 09:24:54AM +0100, Urs Liska wrote: >> >> If this intends to codify the website being tied to the documentation I >> don't really like that. > >The website *is* tied to the documentation. That decision was >made in 2009, and the reasons are just as valid today. I believe you when you say this. But I am having a hard time finding a record of the decision. I expected to find it in the CG under Administrative Policies or under Website work. I couldn't find it either place. Can you help me find a pointer to the discussion and/or the decision rationale? Thanks, Carl _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
