Simon Albrecht <simon.albre...@mail.de> writes:
> On 13.08.2016 10:29, David Kastrup wrote:
>> \part.1 in contrast is slightly different. I'll work on improvements by
>> and by but at the current point of time this is not really at a "proudly
>> announceable by snippets" state. It still has drawbacks and irks.
>
> It seems that others as well as I have been thinking it is a great new
> feature and started to use it quite often, so I wonder if there is any
> kind of caveat for using it yet: will the functionality or syntax
> change? or are those changes merely concerning
> implementation/performance issues?
At the current point of time I think that \part.1 does not copy the
music expression. That's pretty bad if you do stuff like
<<
\transpose c' d' { \part.1 }
\transpose c' d' { \part.1 }
>>
That's sort of a deal-breaker so I'll address it soon.
Also you cannot use \part.1 everywhere that \partI would work: it's a
subset. In particular, it won't work very satisfactorily for post
events. That's not as bad as the first problem: if it doesn't work yet,
it doesn't and one sees it right away.
--
David Kastrup
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
