Hi Simon, > Surely it is a question of priorities. Do such alternating patterns occur > more often than situations with arpeggio direction changing once in a while, > but each change holds for several subsequent chords? That’s the question. (I > cannot answer.)
I think my solution addresses the [OP’s] issue without abandoning the [existing] benefit: by defining \arpU and \arpD as single-use commands (i.e., tweaks), you can still use \arpeggioUp or \arpeggioDown to establish a holding direction change. Yes? Best, Kieren. ________________________________ Kieren MacMillan, composer ‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info ‣ email: i...@kierenmacmillan.info _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel