On 23.02.2016 16:14, Abraham Lee wrote:
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 8:04 AM, Malte Meyn <lilyp...@maltemeyn.de
<mailto:lilyp...@maltemeyn.de>> wrote:
Am 23.02.2016 um 15:52 schrieb Caio Giovaneti de Barros:
I'm trying to write a function to make easier for me to change
arrow
directions in arpeggios.
I would prefer an event function with a tweak:
\version "2.19.36"
arpeggioUp = \tweak arpeggio-direction #UP \arpeggio
\relative c' { <c c' e>\arpeggioUp }
I like this a lot and I feel like I've seen this exact discussion
before, but it didn't result in any core changes.
Dev Team,
Any reason \arpeggioArrowUp and \arpeggioArrowDown can't be defined
this way from the beginning? Is there a use-case where the
"\arpeggioArrowUp <c c' e> \arpeggio" way is necessary?
Surely it is a question of priorities. Do such alternating patterns
occur more often than situations with arpeggio direction changing once
in a while, but each change holds for several subsequent chords? That’s
the question. (I cannot answer.)
Best, Simon
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
