On 2015/08/29 18:13:13, dak wrote:
On 2015/08/29 17:28:33, thomasmorley651 wrote: > On 2015/08/26 08:55:14, dak wrote: > >
https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/diff/1/scm/lily-library.scm
> > File scm/lily-library.scm (right): > > > > >
https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/diff/1/scm/lily-library.scm#newcode793
> > scm/lily-library.scm:793: char-set:whitespace)) > > A mostly theoretic musing: in the predicates documented in NR, we
have
> > `char-whitespace?' listed in "R5RS secondary predicates". > > > > I don't know how it's implemented, but if people compare results, > > char-whitespace? might be the expected point of reference and it's
not like
> this > > is performance-critical. > > > > Using that would mean one less function in our codebase for the
same
> > functionality. > > > > I just thought I'd mention it: it's by no means a necessary change
or even a
> > showstopper. > > Well, I could use `char-whitespace?' to write a different
definition. Ofcourse
a > new definition would still be there. > I've the feeling I don't really understand your proposal...
The proposal is replacing char-set:whitespace with char-whitespace?
which is
already being used in LilyPond and advertised to the user. Just a single-identifier change.
Hope I've got it. Thanks. PATCH-NEW https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
