On 2015/08/26 08:55:14, dak wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/diff/1/scm/lily-library.scm File scm/lily-library.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/diff/1/scm/lily-library.scm#newcode793
scm/lily-library.scm:793: char-set:whitespace)) A mostly theoretic musing: in the predicates documented in NR, we have `char-whitespace?' listed in "R5RS secondary predicates".
I don't know how it's implemented, but if people compare results, char-whitespace? might be the expected point of reference and it's not
like this
is performance-critical.
Using that would mean one less function in our codebase for the same functionality.
I just thought I'd mention it: it's by no means a necessary change or
even a
showstopper.
Well, I could use `char-whitespace?' to write a different definition. Ofcourse a new definition would still be there. I've the feeling I don't really understand your proposal... https://codereview.appspot.com/257580043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
