On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 13:19:26 -0800, <pkx1...@gmail.com> wrote:
https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/20001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode8
ps/encodingdefs.ps:8: /LilyNoteHeadEncoding [
On 2015/01/18 06:33:02, Keith wrote:
This is a little different from "FetaNoteheadsEncoding" in
'mf/out/feta-noteheads11.enc' generated by
'scripts/build/mf-to-table.py'
I need some advice on what to do here from Knut.
https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/20001/ps/encodingdefs.ps#newcode108
ps/encodingdefs.ps:108: /noteheads.d0doFunk {<01> show} def
On 2015/01/18 06:33:02, Keith wrote:
I suppose you use PS definitions here because the Scheme code does not
know the
encoding table, so the Scheme does not know what number to write in
'\?? show'
Again I cannot comment - Knut?
https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/20001/scm/output-ps.scm
File scm/output-ps.scm (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/194090043/diff/20001/scm/output-ps.scm#newcode64
scm/output-ps.scm:64: (ly:inexact->string i 8)))
On 2015/01/18 06:33:02, Keith wrote:
This is the old code that output PS 'show' rather than 'glyphshow'
I don't know what to do here (if anything).
Nothing need be done about these threee.
They were only suggestions for simplification -- and note even suggestions,
just hints that simplification might be possible.
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
