David Kastrup wrote:
> Personally, I am most uncomfortable with the "be relative
> to current settings once" idea: that seems like a total
> nightmare in situations using quotes or similar. The
> question is where we could access a reasonably "default"
> setting that relative references could be based on.
Okay, then I propose a completely new design, which will be
a near total rewrite of the code, but it looks like it will
be more elegant. Pardon the quasi-code.
`\magnifyStaff mag' will do these overrides:
for each shrinkable prop S,
S = (* S (/ mag old-mag))
for each unshrinkable prop U,
U =
(if (< mag 1)
(if (< old-mag 1)
U
(/ U old-mag))
(if (< old-mag 1)
(* U mag))
(* U (/ mag old-mag)))
\magnifyStaffRelative relative-mag
= \magnifyStaff #(* old-mag relative-mag)
\resetStaffSize = \magnifyStaff 1
The "default" setting, corresponding to size "1", will be
equivalent to the size of the staff when magnifyStaff is
first called. However, unlike before, the user won't be
locked in to the initial "default". To change defaults
mid-stream, the user would now be able to do:
...
\magnifyStaff 0.75
...
\resetStaffSize
[change defaults here]
\magnifyStaff 0.75
...
Does this design look better? If you're curious and you
want to try to understand the crux of the confusion in all
of this, read below.
___________________________________________________________
Whether the mag value is interpreted as relative or
absolute, magnifyStaff simply requires a consistent default
size to refer to, if for no other reason than to prevent
staff lines and the like from getting thinner than the
default. It makes sense to me that, at least initially, the
default size should be the size of the staff when
magnifyStaff is first used.
Note that \magnifyStaffRelative will *NOT* be precisely
"relative to the current settings" every time, as
demonstrated by the following example:
...
% staff-space:1.00, staff-line:1.00
\magStaffRelative 0.75
% staff-space:0.75, staff-line:1.00
\magStaffRelative 2
% staff-space:1.50, staff-line:1.50
The call with value 0.75 won't scale staff lines below 1.00,
because they're not supposed to get smaller than the
"default". Accordingly, the call with value 2 won't scale
everything relative to the current settings, because if it
did then the staff lines would be too thick.
If we allow the function to be consistently "relative to the
current settings" each time, then we get staff lines that
are too thin when reducing size. And if we say, "don't ever
let staff lines reduce from the current size", then we get
this:
...
% staff-space:1.00, staff-line:1.00
\magStaffRelative 1.50
% staff-space:1.50, staff-line:1.50
\magStaffRelative 0.5
% staff-space:0.75, staff-line:1.50
Here, the staff lines, which should be back at 1.00, are
stuck at 1.50: too thick. As I see it, the only way around
this is to store some abstraction of an absolute "1" value,
and to keep track of the relationship between the current
staff size and that absolute value.
Okay, hopefully I've stated the issue clearly. Sorry this
is so confusing. I'm just trying to do it right. Let me
know if you have more questions/concerns.
Best,
Mark
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
