Am 02.08.2014 11:35, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
Now with requests for absolute and relative versions, as
>well as this:
>
> \temporary \magnifyStaff 1.3
> ...
> \undo \magnifyStaff 1.3
>
>...I'm starting to wonder how much of this is really
>necessary. Can anyone provide an actual use case to justify
>accommodating either of these requests?
I admit that i don't have an actual use case. I expect that crazy
composers like Mike (hello Mike! :)) could want to make the staff
progressively bigger and bigger each measure, for example as a fancy
way of indicating global crescendo sustained over many measures. But
that's just a speculation.
>
I don't have concrete examples either, but I can think of two practical
use cases:
Temporarily changing staff size may be useful in pedagogical sheets. And
you could make it useful when writing "dialogue" like parts, i.e. when
two or more instruments or singers sing/play alternatingly. Then it may
be helpful for sight-reading when your own part is on maginfied parts of
the staff.
Urs
--
Urs Liska
www.openlilylib.org
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel