----- Original Message -----
From: "Urs Liska" <u...@openlilylib.org>
To: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Saturday, May 10, 2014 12:23 PM
Subject: Re: Issue 3917: Add \alternatingTimeSignatures (issue 97110045)
Thanks, I'll update accordingly. Generally speaking, should a modification
of this kind trigger a new review cycle or can I update it "privately" and
include it when pushing?
I would say it depends how controversial the changes are. If there have
been a few helpful comments that it's easy to take account of, I would not
go for a further review, but would be careful to assume my pushed patch
covers the comments. Where there is debate and discussion, a further
review.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
