Paul Morris <p...@paulwmorris.com> writes: > Jan-Peter Voigt wrote >> I think Guile V2 is the most important issue regarding lilypond in general >> and especially with these thoughts. This would speed up the scheme-part of >> lilypond and ensure its inclusion in linux-distros. > > +1 > > And I suppose that any potential future work on optimizing and speeding up > LilyPond compilation (which I think everyone agrees would be a good thing) > would make more sense after upgrading to Guile 2.0 (maybe even 2.2 ?). > > Does anyone know if we got any applicants for this summer of code project? > I remember seeing at least one inquiry about it.
Didn't hear anything further after my initial reply. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
