Jan-Peter Voigt wrote > I think Guile V2 is the most important issue regarding lilypond in general > and especially with these thoughts. This would speed up the scheme-part of > lilypond and ensure its inclusion in linux-distros.
+1 And I suppose that any potential future work on optimizing and speeding up LilyPond compilation (which I think everyone agrees would be a good thing) would make more sense after upgrading to Guile 2.0 (maybe even 2.2 ?). Does anyone know if we got any applicants for this summer of code project? I remember seeing at least one inquiry about it. Cheers, -Paul -- View this message in context: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Serious-feedback-and-improvement-headroom-tp161193p161570.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
