Urs Liska <u...@openlilylib.org> writes: > Am 20.02.2014 10:58, schrieb David Kastrup: >> Well, let's put this in perspective. This was a call on the GNU >> maintainer list for proposing projects within 12 hours. That basically >> requires turnkey-ready proposals, and Urs volunteered what basically >> amounted to buzzwords referring to ongoing work that had no obvious >> publicly available roadmap or shape. By the time the flames dies down, >> there were few hours left anyway. > > So what is missing info: Did you in the end propose the Guile update > project?
I proposed that right away, I think even before asking on the developer list for further ideas. I don't think there would have been a problem with putting out more than one proposal, but since we are potentially competing with other GNU projects for resources, I would not have wanted to propose something that I did not feel reasonably confident about. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
