2013/11/12 <d...@gnu.org>: > So this patch leaves open questions, and people might give themselves > answers consistent with the current behavior. Overriding those answers > later with a convert-ly rule seems unfeasible: this is really a bit too > invasive and complex to change using convert-ly. > > The current behavior is reasonably predictable and reasonably > straightforward. With regard to chords, it's not entirely lovable. I'm > not sure making it more complex is a good idea, though.
While i would love having the repetition work with chords, i'm underqualified to judge how feasible implementing this would be. I don't want to put pressure on you - decide according to your judgement. best, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
