2013/11/12 <d...@gnu.org>: > It still would not be fun in connection with TabStaff, not repeating > string numbers and stuff, and such repetition is really not feasible.
I don't understand what you mean here. > Of course the problem is that we have to make a decision what to > support: > > a) we don't commit ourselves either way: it is undefined what a pure > duration after an intervening chord will do. > > b) just single pitches, no chords: that's what this patch proposes. > > c) also chords: this patch needs more work, supporting code must be > written, Pitch_squash_engraver has to be changed etc etc. > > The problem is that with both options b) and c), we'll soonish have > music depending on this behavior. > > I'm leaning towards a): tell people not to rely on particular behavior > after a chord for now. This probably is a good idea. At least i prefer to a) over b). _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
