>> I see this in your "bad" examples of ties: >> d'4~ s4 d' s2 e'4~ s4 e' s >> >> How do you justify that this should work with non logical spacers included? > > What do you mean by "non logical spacers"? I don't quite understand > this question.
I mean why would you write d'4~ s4 d' in real life? but OK, I had not seen tieWaitForNote. So I understand that it should work the way you did it. Frédéric _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel