>> I see this in your "bad" examples of ties:
>> d'4~ s4 d' s2 e'4~ s4 e' s
>>
>> How do you justify that this should work with non logical spacers included?
>
> What do you mean by "non logical spacers"?  I don't quite understand
> this question.

I mean why would you write d'4~ s4 d' in real life?
but OK, I had not seen tieWaitForNote. So I understand that it should
work the way you did it.

Frédéric

_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel

Reply via email to