On 2013/03/07 18:10:46, J_lowe wrote:
On 2013/03/07 17:31:08, dak wrote: > On 2013/03/07 15:56:52, Trevor Daniels wrote: > > Looking good. Obviously the text which describes > > \relative will need attention too, > > Not just that. So far all humanly written changes are constrained
to
> python/convertrules.ly and ly/music-functions-init.ly (the actual > change of the definition). All the rest is done by convert-ly so
far.
> > If my grep-foo is correct, there are still more than 1500 occurences > of \relative followed by a pitch. Now this is spread across > translations, but it is still clear that we are not talking about a > complete job. But then the \relative conventions used previously
had
> been far from consistent, too. > > One can probably still improve the convert-ly rule and reduce quite
a
> bit more. > > > but this is now looking like a change worth making. > > Well, let's say that it is now looking like something quite more
than
> a hoax. I've put about a day of work into it now, and I think the > current state is at least serious enough for getting more opinions > from both developers and users. > > Unfortunately, the patch is now large enough that git cl uploads it
in
> parts to Rietveld and Patchy does not get along with that. > > And obviously, this needs to get a documentation testing as well as > the regtests.
Well if you want to give me a git formatted patch I'd be happy to test
it
manually.
James
On the way. https://codereview.appspot.com/7546044/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
