On 30 nov. 2012, at 20:42, Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2012 01:37:48 -0800, <m...@mikesolomon.org> wrote: > >> Ugh...this is a really nasty cyclic dependency. > > There is sometimes a cyclic dependency message, but that is not the problem. > I'm pretty sure I used \stemUp to determine the stem directions and break > this dependency chain. >
I think it is still a problem insofar as no patch should knowingly add cyclic dependencies to the code base unless it has a surefire followup that'll remove them. >> 1) note_head_x_shift >> 2) stem direction >> 3) beam direction > > There is a problem whenever a cross-staff beam /would/ auto-knee, even if the > knee is prevented by overridden stem directions. The beam is drawn as if the > note-heads were all on one staff. > I'll be able to slog through all of these around Christmas-ish if not sooner. Cheers, MS _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
