Thomas Morley <thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> writes: > [...] >> So, i believe that LilyPond shouldn't always follow her users' >> intuition, even if they are professional musicians. In this case, i >> think that \tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet 3/2 (for 3 notes in time >> of 2), because it corresponds to mathematical ratio, and is similar to >> scaling durations. > > +1
-1 from me for this one. We have \times for that already and I can't count the times it took me to get the fraction right. And with the name "\times" there is at least the mnemonic of the name itself. When I have a tuplet that is marked 3:2 on the tuplet itself using the respective tuplet style \override TupletNumber #'text = #tuplet-number::calc-fraction-text then it makes no sense at all that I have to enter it as \tuplet 2/3 { ... } for tuplets that are three to two normal notes. That's not merely unintuitive, it is (oh goodie, no [talk] tag) plain absurd. How can anybody write "\tuplet 2/3 is better than \tuplet 3/2 (for 3 notes in time of 2), because it corresponds to mathematical ratio," with a straight keyboard? How does 2/3 correspond to 3 notes in time of 2? Let me stomp my feet in defiance and holler. Ah, that's better. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel