On 2012/10/02 03:02:15, aleksandr.andreev wrote: ...
If we implement the patch as written, Kievan note heads outside of the KievanVoice context wouldn't make sense. I'm not altogether opposed to
that (I
see no real reason to not use KievanVoice), but it seems like a
"policy" issue,
as it would make Kievan notation different from how other ancient
notations are
handled.
If you are talking about the Documentation in the Notation Reference, the Ancient Notation doesn't follow (mostly) the standard Policies at all - indeed there is a while tracker to tidy this section up, I started but I don't have any knowlegde of Ancient Notation to make distinctions between the different types. So I wouldn't worry about that. If examples need a specific context include in the @lilypond examples then so be it. I don't think that that is a huge deal. We do try not to have tweaks and overrides in the examples (they go into snippets in that case) but this is hardly a tweak and so could be made into an exception. https://codereview.appspot.com/6584045/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
