Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >>> If there is widespread agreement that the idea is good, then at some >>> point it could be implemented. >> >> ... but as David has correctly mentioned previously, it is not >> fruitful to discuss something for a long time and make everyone agree >> to it, just to find out later on that the idea can't be implemented in >> the current framework. > > I agree that doing so isn't fruitful. However, it may be better to > waste some time and be sure that something is a bad idea than not to > discuss it at all and have bad feelings about it.
Our track record for decreasing bad feelings through discussion certainly offers a lot of room for improvement. > The most efficient way of doing things doesn't have to be the one > which makes people most happy/satisfied. Ah, but this is a hobbyist project. Its ultimate goal is to make more people happy. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
