Werner LEMBERG <w...@gnu.org> writes: >>> Ouch. Sound like something we seriously don't want at all. >> >> Right - this means that we seriously don't want to be a music >> interchange/storage format. > > What about a *subset* of LilyPond for this purpose?
It should be reasonably easy to use displayLilyMusic in connection with a few hooks (toplevel-book-handler and its ilk) for a stripped LilyPond exporter. Its charm would be moderate: basically, it would preserve information better than MusicXML. At the cost of being more version-dependent. It would, however, be a reasonably well-understood subset, and should meet the parse/interpret-separately paradigm. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
