On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys <hanw...@gmail.com> wrote: > To me, a Grand Input Syntax "fixing" of LilyPond, would amount to > creating a syntax that strictly separates parsing and interpretation. > This implies not only rethinking a lot of syntax, but also it means > letting go of some of the flexibility and conciseness of the current > format.
This sound like a Right Thing to do, but i'm not knowledgeable enough to know what the results would actually be. Examples appreciated (hopefully some examples will show in other discussions). cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
