On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 7:33 AM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > Frightening rather. I don't spend enough time defending LilyPond > against awful patches as it is. [...] > It is easy to make it easier to meddle with LilyPond code. The low > number of contributors is not due to our toolchains. It is because few > people are comfortable poking around in the dark. And for good reason.
While i agree with the problems you outline (not enough comments, maintenance timebombs etc), it's fascinating to observe that while i wouldn't say that you're a downright pessimist (and you certainly don't lack a sense of humour), so many of your emails are dark and menacing! ;-) On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, m...@mikesolomon.org <m...@mikesolomon.org> wrote: > What did take me time to learn is how everything fits together (what a > callback is, where things are triggered when, what happens before what). +1. And we need more comments in spirit of the one in lines 35-69 of simple-spacer.cc. cheers, Janek _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
