Keith OHara <k-ohara5...@oco.net> writes: > Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond <at> gmail.com> writes: > >> On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:41 PM, David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> wrote: >> > Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes: >> >> So far I don't feel that the discussion has been very fruitful. >> > >> > And it will not be fruitful in the near future. One reason is that I am >> > basically the only one seriously working on the parser right now, and I >> > am learning while I am working on it, both about the work flow for >> > getting Bison where you want it, and about the complications. This is >> > work that is really hard to do, but it can't be done except, basically, >> > incrementally. >> >> For what it's worth, i'm ok with this discussion (and similar ones) >> happening on devel, as long as we won't loose track of concrete >> proposals (when they will appear, ofc.). >> > > I posted a patch for the numbers-in-identifiers enhancement > <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1670> > > It might help a little as a concrete example, showing the challenges of > supporting LilyPond's very lenient syntax. > > (I can't really tell for sure, but I think maybe David likes the patch.)
Just shows what an abysmal communicator I am. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
