Janek Warchoł <janek.lilypond <at> gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:41 PM, David Kastrup <dak <at> gnu.org> wrote: > > Graham Percival <graham <at> percival-music.ca> writes: > >> So far I don't feel that the discussion has been very fruitful. > > > > And it will not be fruitful in the near future. One reason is that I am > > basically the only one seriously working on the parser right now, and I > > am learning while I am working on it, both about the work flow for > > getting Bison where you want it, and about the complications. This is > > work that is really hard to do, but it can't be done except, basically, > > incrementally. > > For what it's worth, i'm ok with this discussion (and similar ones) > happening on devel, as long as we won't loose track of concrete > proposals (when they will appear, ofc.). >
I posted a patch for the numbers-in-identifiers enhancement <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1670> It might help a little as a concrete example, showing the challenges of supporting LilyPond's very lenient syntax. (I can't really tell for sure, but I think maybe David likes the patch.) _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
