On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 12:04 PM, David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> wrote: >> Vectors don't make sense unless you give a mechanism to map/iterate >> over them, ie something along the lines of >> >> (make-parallel-music (vector->list >> (map (lambda (x) (add-new-context "Staff" x)) violin))) > > It would be easy enough to let $@ work on arbitrary sequences, not just > lists. You can already write things like > > << $@(map ...) >> > > How many people are asking for \violin2 all the time?
How many people of these are asking for a O(1) indexed access container? I think most people just want to write "2" instead of "Two". I don't see how a person asking for \violin2 is asking for arrays. Most compositions don't have more than 2 violin voices anyway. I am actually supportive of allowing digits in identifiers, it has irked me for years that we could not get it to work. I vaguely recall you implemented this in 2.16 already, but I guess I am mistaken? -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
