On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Janek Warchoł <janek.lilyp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> when i met Jan in Waltrop, we discussed beam positions calculated by > LilyPond. I've shown Jan some cases where default beam positions were > ugly (see attached "beam problems") - he was surprised and asked me to > check whether old LilyPond versions performed the same. I've checked > this now and i can confirm that the beaming in remained virtually > unchanged since LilyPond 2.6 (see attached "old vesions"). > I've also checked LilyPond 2.16, and in some cases the beaming is > better, but many problems remain. That is a testament to the regtest's usefulness, and it was certainly intended to be like that. > Would you be interested in fixing beaming code together? Sure, fixing things is always good. The beaming code is pretty generic, so I expect that this will mostly be about tweaking scoring functions, and making sure existing situations stay the same. > > best, > Janek -- Han-Wen Nienhuys - han...@xs4all.nl - http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
