Quoting Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca>:
On Sun, May 06, 2012 at 08:58:11AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
David Kastrup wrote Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:57 AM
>In fact, isn't <> generally prettier than s1*0? Should we be using it
>in code and documentation rather than s1*0?
Definitely prettier, but maybe not so transparent as s1*0.
+1
What about defining a
null
or
n
"note name"? Then we could write
c4 n\footnote
My preference is "z". There are fewer words that start with "z" than
with "n" and it's easy to remember "z" as shorthand for "zero".
Reusing symbols like "<" and ">" for new meanings would turn Lilypond
sources into something like Perl.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
